Vote the PersonNot the party
Candidate

Lyndsay Newell

Democrat

Attorney and partner, Cantey Hanger (Fort Worth)

Lyndsay Newell is a family law attorney and partner at Cantey Hanger in Fort Worth, according to her campaign site2. She is the Democratic nominee for judge of the 231st District Court, a family court, in Tarrant County1. The 231st is currently presided over by Judge Jesus Nevarez Jr.3.

  • Partner, Cantey Hanger, described by her campaign as the oldest law firm in Fort Worth (the candidate's own account)2
  • Family law practice, representing children and families, including work at the Court of Appeals on Child Protective Services cases (the candidate's own account)2
  • Former first-grade teacher (the candidate's own account)2
  • Not a sitting judge. She is the Democratic nominee on the November 3, 2026 ballot for the 231st Judicial District1.
  • Bar poll: Tarrant County Bar Association 2026 Judicial Candidate Poll (Jan 6 to Jan 29, 2026; 441 of 2,026 eligible attorney members voted, 21.8%). This is a non-binding poll of lawyers, not an endorsement by the Association. Results for Lyndsay Newell: Strongly Recommend 18.8% (40), Recommend 16.4% (35), Neutral 13.1% (28), Not Recommend 7.0% (15), Strongly Not Recommend 12.7% (27), Skipped 31.9% (68) (percent of the voters who chose that race category, with vote counts). The poll was taken before the March 3 primary45.

Last reviewed 2026-10-06. Spotted something wrong? Every claim links to its source so you can check it yourself.

Sources (6)

Every claim on this page links to one of these
  1. Texas Secretary of State: 2026 General Election Ballot Certification (Aug 28, 2026)Texas Secretary of State
  2. About Lyndsay Newell (campaign site)Lyndsay Newell for Judge
  3. Family CourtsTarrant County
  4. 2026 Judicial Candidate Poll - Reissue (results PDF)Tarrant County Bar Association
  5. Judicial Polls and LinksTarrant County Bar Association
  6. Public Sanctions, Issued FY 2002 through FY 2026 (annual pages searched 2026-10-02)State Commission on Judicial Conduct