Who is running for Colorado House District 33 in 2026?
Here are the candidates for Colorado House District 33 on the November 3, 2026 ballot. This race is on the ballot for voters in Colorado House District 33.
Positions come only from each candidate's own votes, official actions, statements and questionnaire answers, never from party labels. Every item links to its source.
Side by side
Each candidate's position on the issues this office handles, from their own record. Details and sources are in each profile below.
| Issue | Kenny Van NguyenDemocrat | Nate JorgensenRepublican |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | Government-run coverage for everyone (Medicare for All)Said · low | No public position |
| Abortion | Legal in most cases up to viability (about 24 weeks)Said · low | No public position |
| Energy and climate | No public position | All of the above: oil, gas, nuclear and renewables, and let markets pickSaid · medium |
| Housing and growth | Allow townhomes and apartments in more places to bring prices downVoted · high | No public position |
| Gender care for minors | No public position | No, ban these treatments for minorsSaid · medium |
| Transgender athletes | No public position | No, teams should be based on biological sex, with open or coed optionsSaid · medium |
Kenny Van Nguyen
Democrat · IncumbentColorado State Representative, District 33
Kenny Van Nguyen is the Democratic incumbent for Colorado House District 33. His campaign site says he was appointed to the Colorado House, served on the Broomfield City Council for Ward 1 from 2023 until January 2026, and earned a Master of Public Administration at the University of Colorado Denver5.
Where they stand 3 issues · tap any issue for the evidence
Housing and growthAllow townhomes and apartments in more places to bring prices downhigh
Voted · high confidence- His campaign site says increasing affordable housing, allowing for more housing options, and reinvesting state dollars can help bridge the housing gap. (2026) source
- Voted yes on HB26-1001, the HOME Act, which requires larger local governments to allow qualifying organizations to build housing on their land regardless of zoning (House third reading, 35 to 24). (2026-02-06) source
HealthcareGovernment-run coverage for everyone (Medicare for All)low
Said · low confidence- His campaign site says he supports the implementation of a universal healthcare plan in Colorado. (2026) source
AbortionLegal in most cases up to viability (about 24 weeks)low
Said · low confidence- His campaign site says he sponsored HB26-1335 so college students can access abortion medication, and that reproductive rights are under attack. (2026) source
No public position found on: Safety net programs, Minimum wage, Business regulation, Guns, Immigration, Energy and climate, School choice, Curriculum and books, Policing and crime, Election rules, Judges, Politicians trading stocks, Marijuana, Gender care for minors, Redistricting, Term limits, Campaign finance, Electoral College, Ranked-choice voting, Death penalty, Qualified immunity, Mandatory minimums, Drug prices, Childcare and pre-K, Paid leave, Student loans, AI regulation, Kids online, School vaccines, Nuclear power, E-Verify mandate, Transgender athletes, DEI programs, Religion in schools, China policy.
Nate Jorgensen
RepublicanCandidate for Colorado House District 33
Nate Jorgensen is the Republican nominee for Colorado House District 33. His campaign site describes him as a longtime Colorado and Broomfield resident1.
Where they stand 3 issues · tap any issue for the evidence
Gender care for minorsNo, ban these treatments for minorsmedium
Said · medium confidence- His campaign site calls for protections against irreversible medical procedures on minors. (2026) source
Transgender athletesNo, teams should be based on biological sex, with open or coed optionsmedium
Said · medium confidence- His campaign site calls for girls' sports based on biology. (2026) source
Energy and climateAll of the above: oil, gas, nuclear and renewables, and let markets pickmedium
Said · medium confidence- His campaign site says to protect access to all reliable, affordable energy sources including natural gas and to reject forced all-electric timelines. (2026) source
No public position found on: Safety net programs, Minimum wage, Business regulation, Healthcare, Abortion, Guns, Immigration, School choice, Curriculum and books, Housing and growth, Policing and crime, Election rules, Judges, Politicians trading stocks, Marijuana, Redistricting, Term limits, Campaign finance, Electoral College, Ranked-choice voting, Death penalty, Qualified immunity, Mandatory minimums, Drug prices, Childcare and pre-K, Paid leave, Student loans, AI regulation, Kids online, School vaccines, Nuclear power, E-Verify mandate, DEI programs, Religion in schools, China policy.
Last reviewed 2026-10-08. Spotted something wrong? Every claim links to its source so you can check it yourself.